Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J. E., II
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Time Perception as a Function of Locus of Control

John E. Stewart, II

Kevin P. Moore

Mercyhurst College

The present study investigated the joint effects of locus of control (as measured by Rotter's IE scale) and external cues on subjects' estimation of time passage, using (counterbalanced) 15, 30, 45, and 55-second intervals. Forty-four volunteer subjects were employed in a mixed factorial design with two levels of locus of control (Internal/External), with repeated measures on four blocks of time intervals, and on two levels of cues (cue/no cue). Cues were presented ten seconds before the end of each time interval. It was hypothesized that internals would estimate the time intervals more accurately than would externals, when cues were present, while externals' estimates of time were expected to correspond to the cues. Results confirmed the predicted (Locus of Control x Cue) interaction (p <.001). The findings imply that the internal's conception of time is more dynamic and autonomous than is the external's.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 4, No. 1, 56-58 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727800400111


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?