This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Green, R. B. Articles by Mack, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Green, R. B. Articles by Mack, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Would Groups Do Better without Social Psychologists? A Response to Buys

St. Joseph's College

Jonathan Mack

State University of New York, at Old Westbury

Social psychological research on peer group experi- ence, as summarized and interpreted by Buys (1978), appears to show that such groups have a consistently negative effect on their members. This apparent conclusion reflects a significant bias of social psychologists in general and of Buys in particular. It ignores significant data in support of positive group functions as well as accepting a negative interpretation of group functioning without adequate experimental support. The authors suggest that social psychologists reorient their work in the direction of examining potentially positive functions of group experience. Emphasis is placed on the value of Sullivan's interpersonal theory in considering productive aspects of peer groups.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Buys On Humans Would Do Better without Groups: A Final Note Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1978; 4(4): 568 - 568. [Abstract]