Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carnevale, P. J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Britton, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carnevale, P. J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Britton, S. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Looking Tough: The Negotiator Under Constituent Surveillance

Peter J. D. Carnevale

Dean G. Pruitt

Scott D. Britton

State University of New York at Buffalo

Constituent surveillance encouraged the negotiator's use of such competitive tactics as threats, positional commitments, and persuasive arguments. Negotiators apparently chose these tactics in order to look tough in the eyes of their constituent. These tactics resulted in diminished joint and individual outcomes. The results of the study suggest that constituents might fare better by not monitoring the behavior of their negotiators. Future research might profit by identifying the crucial intervening variables that account for the surveillance effects.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 1, 118-121 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727900500126
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. A. Hogg
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2001; 5(3): 184 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
R. M. Kramer, P. Pommerenke, and E. Newton
The Social Context of Negotiation: Effects of Social Identity and Interpersonal Accountability on Negotiator Decision Making
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1993; 37(4): 633 - 654.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. M. Zubek, D. G. Pruitt, R. S. Peirce, N. B. McGillicuddy, and H. Syna
Disputant and Mediator Behaviors Affecting Short-Term Success in Mediation
Journal of Conflict Resolution, September 1, 1992; 36(3): 546 - 572.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
J. A. Wall Jr. and M. W. Blum
Negotiations
Journal of Management, June 1, 1991; 17(2): 273 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]