Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, S. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 1, 73-76 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727900500116
© 1979 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Self-Presentation, Self-Monitoring, and the Self-Serving Bias in Causal Attribution

Robert M. Arkin

William K. Gabrenya, Jr.

Alan S. Appelman

Susan T. Cochran

University of Missouri-Columbia

Research has shown that individuals' causal attributions are affected by the degree of public scrutiny of their behavior (Bradley, 1978). An experiment was conducted to test a self-presentational explanation of this finding. High and low self-monitors were or were not closely scrutinized (videotaped) during their performance of a task at which they either succeeded or failed. Low self-monitors were expected to provide an attributional baseline (little or no self-presentation) against which the self-presentational tendencies of high self-monitors could be assessed. It was found that high self-monitors assumed significantly greater responsibility for success than for failure when videotaped, but assumed only somewhat more responsibility for success than for failure when not taped. Surprisingly, low self-monitors' attributions were affected by the manipulation of evaluation intensity. Low self-monitors assumed more responsibility for success than for failure when they were not taped, but assumed no more responsibility for success than for failure when they were taped.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. E. Jones, K. J. Brenner, and J. G. Knight
When Failure Elevates Self-Esteem
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1990; 16(2): 200 - 209.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W. K. Gabrenya Jr. and R. M. Arkin
Self-Monitoring Scale: Factor Structure and Correlates
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1980; 6(1): 13 - 22.
[Abstract]