Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langer, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Langer, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 3, 295-298 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727900500304
© 1979 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Role of Mindlessness in a Typical Social Psychological Experiment

Ellen J. Langer

Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Helen M. Newman

Department of Communications, Hunter College, C.U.N.Y., New York City.

An experiment, offered as a methodological prototype, was conducted to assess whether subjects in a typical, successful social psychological experiment pick up cues planted by experimenters and then proceed relatively mindlessly with the task at hand. The Asch/Kelley experiment was used to test this hypothesis. Subjects were tested on recall of information they had just been given. As predicted, subjects who were mindless with respect to this information were more likely to confirm the Asch/Kelley prediction than disconfirm it, while there was no difference in confirmation for the mindful group. The implications of these results for our ability to generalize our findings from the laboratory to the nonlaboratory world were discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
E.-J. Lee
When Placebic Information Differs From Real Information: Cognitive and Motivational Bases of Mindful Reactions to Informational Social Influence
Communication Research, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 615 - 645.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Green and C. Sedikides
Affect and Self-Focused Attention Revisited: The Role of Affect Orientation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1999; 25(1): 104 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. L. Kerr, J. Garst, D. A. Lewandowski, and S. E. Harris
That Still, Small Voice: Commitment to Cooperate as an Internalized Versus a Social Norm
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1997; 23(12): 1300 - 1311.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. E. Ashforth and Y. Fried
The Mindlessness of Organizational Behaviors
Human Relations, April 1, 1988; 41(4): 305 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. Newman
Communication within Ongoing Intimate Relationships: An Attributional Perspective
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1981; 7(1): 59 - 70.
[Abstract]