Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brockner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nova, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brockner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nova, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 3, 311-315 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727900500308
© 1979 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Further Determinants of Attitude Attributions: The Perceived Effects of Assigned Behavior on Post-Behavior Attitudes

Joel Brockner

Department of Psychology, SUNY at Brockport, Brockport, New York

Michael Nova

SUNY at Brockport

Many studies have shown that observers tend to make behavior-consistent attitude attributions about a target person (T), even vhenATTs behavior is-under heavy situational constraints. However, there is some controversy over the reasons for this "as' signed behavior effect." The present studies were designed to determine if the effect were contingent on subjects' actual exposure to T's behavior. Subjects were merely told about Ts who had been assigned to record opposing speeches, and were then asked to assign true attitudes to them. Ts' speech direction had a significant effect on the attitudes attributed to them, suggesting that the engulfing hypothesis proposed by Snyder and Jones and the attitude projection theory of Yandell and Insko may not completely account for previous findings. The present results lend support to an "inferred self-persuasion process," whereby the attitudes attributed to Ts may be also due to the perceived effects of the role-playing situation on Ts' post-behavior attitudes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?