Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, M.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 6, No. 3, 421-426 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728063015

Testing Hypotheses about Other People

The Role of the Hypothesis

Mark Snyder

University of Minnesota

Bruce Campbell

University of Minnesota

This investigation examined the influence of the manner in which hypotheses about other people. are framed on the strategies that individuals formulate to test these hypotheses. Male and female participants formulated question-asking strategies to test hypotheses about other people. For some participants, hypotheses were framed exclusively in terms of attributes that would confirm the hypothesis. For other participants, hypotheses were framed both in terms of attributes that would confirm and in terms of attributes that would disconfirm the hypothesis. In each case participants planned to test their hypotheses by preferentially soliciting, by means of the questions they chose to ask, behavioral evidence that would confirm their hypotheses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
K. L. Conway and J. D. Krumboltz
Sensitivity to Marital Difficulties
The Family Journal, April 1, 1997; 5(2): 120 - 124.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
C. B. Murray
Estimating Achievement Performance: A Confirmation Bias
Journal of Black Psychology, February 1, 1996; 22(1): 67 - 85.
[Abstract]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
F. M. Jablin and V. D. Miller
Interviewer and Applicant Questioning Behavior in Employment Interviews
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1990; 4(1): 51 - 86.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
C. R. BERGER and K. KELLERMANN
Personal Opacity and Social Information Gathering: Explorations in Strategic Communication
Communication Research, June 1, 1989; 16(3): 314 - 351.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. White
A Model of the Layperson as Pragmatist
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1984; 10(3): 333 - 348.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Snyder and P. White
Testing Hypotheses about Other People: Strategies of Verification and Falsification
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1981; 7(1): 39 - 43.
[Abstract]