Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edelmann, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hampson, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edelmann, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hampson, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 1, 109-116 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728171017
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Recognition of Embarrassment

Robert J. Edelmann

Birkbeck College, London University

Sarah E. Hampson

Birkbeck College, London University

Two experiments were conducted to determine whether embarrassment is a recognizable emotion independent of the nonverbal associates of humor. In the first experiment subjects attempted to identify embarrassment or amusement from silent videotape recordings presented under three viewing conditions: body, face, or face and body together. Correct recognition of embarrassment required both face and body cues while amusement required only facial cues. Embarrassment was incorrectly identified as amusement from facial cues. Experiment 2 investigated the relative importance of facial versus bodily cues for the recognition of embarrassment and amusement. Subjects, who viewed only the face plus body condition, indicated on a schematic drawing of a person which part they were utilizing to make their judgments. While the mouth signaled amusement, the eyes, hands, lower legs, and mouth were all important signals of embarrassment. The part played by amusement in an embarrassing incident is discussed in the light of these findings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. K. Marcus, J. R. Wilson, and R. S. Miller
Are Perceptions of Emotion in the Eye of the Beholder? A Social Relations Analysis of Judgments of Embarrassment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1996; 22(12): 1220 - 1228.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. J. Edelmann, J. Asendorpf, A. Contarello, V. Zammuner, J. Georgas, and C. Villanueva
Self-Reported Expression of Embarrassment in Five European Cultures
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, December 1, 1989; 20(4): 357 - 371.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
R. J. Edelmann
Social Embarrassment: An Analysis of the Process
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 1985; 2(2): 195 - 213.
[Abstract]