Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakover, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rakover, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 1, 123-130 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728171019
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Social Psychological Theory and Falsification

Sam S. Rakover

Oakland University

Greenwald has suggested that the failure to settle the issue between dissonance and self-perception theories may be attributed to the fact that the operational definitions of these theories are not well-established. Therefore, unpredicted data do not necessarily disconfirm these theories; the new findings are instead incorporated into their operational definitions. Leary examined Greenwald's proposal in light of the new philosophy of science (the Holistic approach) and concluded that it is unfounded. The present contention is that, although social psychology is susceptible to the analysis of the Holistic approach, the problem of the connection between theory and data in social psychology can be distinguished from the Holistic view concerning falsification. In support of this claim, four different problems related to the theory-data connection are discussed. A comparison between the natural sciences (especially classical physics, from which the Holistic approach was developed) and social psychology is made in relation to these four problems, and it is found that, while they have very little effrct, if any, in the former, they' have a major effect in the latter.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. G. Greenwald and D. L. Ronis
On the Conceptual Disconfirmation of Theories
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1981; 7(1): 131 - 137.
[Abstract]