Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furby, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Furby, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 2, 206-211 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728172004
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Satisfaction with Outcome Distributions

Studies from Two Small Communities

Lita Furby

The Wright Institute

Brickman's (1975) laboratory finding that an equal distribution is preferred over a positively skewed distribution is found to also hold for Morawetz's (1977) real-world study of two Israeli moshavim. However, the hedonic calculus derived from adaptation level theory which seemed to explain Brickman's laboratory results is shown to be invalid for the real-world data. In particular, the generally assumed positive relation between individual satisfaction and income level did not hold for the Israeli community studied by Morawetz. The discrepancy between the two studies is interpreted as suggesting that the moral desirability of the general distribution may be a term in the utility functions of individuals in at least some social groups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?