Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steele, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steele, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 3, 393-397 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728173004
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Making the Dissonant Act Unreflective of Self

Dissonance Avoidance and the Expectancy of a Value-Affirming Response

Claude M. Steele

University of Washington

Thomas J. Liu

University of Washington

It was predicted that when a counterattitudinal act is accompanied by the expectation of a future response which can affirm the contradicted attitude or value, dissonance and subsequent dissonance-reducing attitude change would be inhibited, even if the affirming response could not reconcile the specific inconsistency or eliminate the unwanted consequences of the discrepant act. The expectation of a value-affirming response is assumed to provide a context of cognitions in which the single discrepant act can be viewed as less indicative of a self-disposition, and consequently as less important—a perception that should result in less dissonance arousal. This reasoning was supported by the finding that among subjects who wrote counterattitudinal essays opposing more funding for handicap facilities under high choice instructions, those who expected a later, unrelated opportunity to help blind students showed no dissonance-reducing attitude change. Results are discussed as to their implications about the circumstances under which cognitive change will be a response to counterattitudinal behavior.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
O. Govorun, K. Fuegen, and B. K. Payne
Stereotypes Focus Defensive Projection
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 781 - 793.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. Blanton, J. Cooper, I. Slkurnik, and J. Aronson
When Bad Things Happen to Good Feedback: Exacerbating the Need for Self-Justification with Self-Affirmations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1997; 23(7): 684 - 692.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. B. Fried and E. Aronson
Hypocrisy, Misattribution, and Dissonance Reduction
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1995; 21(9): 925 - 933.
[Abstract]