Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petty, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mirels, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Petty, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mirels, H. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 3, 493-503 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728173020
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Intimacy and Scarcity of Self-Disclosure

Effects on Interpersonal Attraction for Males and Females

Richard E. Petty

University of Missouri-Columbia

Herbert L. Mirels

Ohio State University

An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that the relationship between the intimacy of self-disclosure and liking for the self-disclosing person is mediated in part by the perceived scarcity of the revelations. Within a factorial design, subjects expecting to hear a same-sex partner disclose information which was low, medium, or high in intimacy, were either given no information about the scarcity of the disclosures or were led to believe that the partner would ordinarily reveal such information to a great many people or to very few people. Although both males and females gave clear evidence of disclosure reciprocity, males' liking for their partners failed to be influenced by either the intimacy or scarcity of the expected revelations. For females, when no scarcity information was provided, increased information intimacy produced greater liking. As anticipated, when scarcity was held constant at either a high or low level, the effects of intimacy on attraction were attenuated and nonsignificant. The findings are discussed in terms of a revised commodity theory formulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
N. K. Ensari and N. Miller
The Application of the Personalization Model in Diversity Management
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 589 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
T. Tam, M. Hewstone, J. Harwood, A. Voci, and J. Kenworthy
Intergroup Contact and Grandparent-Grandchild Communication: The Effects of Self-Disclosure on Implicit and Explicit Biases Against Older People
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 413 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
N. Ensari and N. Miller
Prejudice and Intergroup Attributions: The Role of Personalization and Performance Feedback
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2005; 8(4): 391 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. Omarzu
A Disclosure Decision Model: Determining How and When Individuals Will Self-Disclose
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2000; 4(2): 174 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]