Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saulnier, K.
Right arrow Articles by Perlman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Saulnier, K.
Right arrow Articles by Perlman, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 4, 559-564 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728174006
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Actor-Observer Bias is Alive and Well in Prison

A Sequel to Wells

Kathryn Saulnier

University of Manitoba

Daniel Perlman

University of Manitoba

Based on attribution theory analysis, the authors predicted that actors attribute their behavior more to internal and unstable causes than do observers. From this logic, actors should also assess as less probable future occurrences of their behavior. 7hese hypotheses were tested by having inmates and officials at a medium security penitentiary rate the causes of the prisoners' (N= 60) offenses. The results supported all three predictions. These data are in contrast with those collected by Wells (1980), who found results inconsistent with the actor-observer bias postulate. An explanation of the different results of the two studies was offered in terms of whether observers had, or had not, previously engaged in the same behaviors as the actors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
V. L. QUINSEY, K. S. REID, and L. E. STERMAC
Mentally Disordered Offenders' Accounts of Their Crimes
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 1996; 23(3): 472 - 489.
[Abstract]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
V. L. QUINSEY and M. CYR
Perceived Dangerousness and Treatability of Offenders: The Effects of Internal Versus External Attributions of Crime Causality
J Interpers Violence, December 1, 1986; 1(4): 458 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]