Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frey, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frey, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 4, 621-626 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728174018
© 1981 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Reversible and Irreversible Decisions

Preference for Consonant Information as a Function of Attractiveness of Decision Alternatives

Dieter Frey

Universität Kiel

The present experiment determined whether preference for consonant or dissonant information differs when (a) decisions are reversible instead of irreversible, and (b) when different amounts of dissonance are induced. Dissonance was manipulated by having subjects make decisions between alternatives with varying degrees of similarity in attractiveness. Subjects' preference for consonant information was generally stronger after making irreversible decisions than after making reversible ones. When decisions were irreversible, the relative preference for consonant over dissonant information increased with the similarity in attractiveness of the decision alternatives. When decisions were reversible, the relative preference for consonant information decreased with the similarity in attractiveness of the alternatives. In accordance to earlier investigations on selective exposure, experimental manipulation did not affect the avoidance of dissonance information. The results are interpreted in terms of both dissonance theory and choice certainty theory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. M. Smith, L. R. Fabrigar, D. M. Powell, and M.-J. Estrada
The Role of Information-Processing Capacity and Goals in Attitude-Congruent Selective Exposure Effects
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 948 - 960.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. L. Sommer, I. A. Horowitz, and M. J. Bourgeois
When Juries Fail to Comply with the Law: Biased Evidence Processing in Individual and Group Decision Making
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2001; 27(3): 309 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Frey and M. Rosch
Information Seeking after Decisions: The Roles of Novelty of Information and Decision Reversibility
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1984; 10(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract]