Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuenot, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Fugita, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cuenot, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Fugita, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 1, 100-106 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728281016
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Perceived Homosexuality

Measuring Heterosexual Attitudinal and Nonverbal Reactions

Randall G. Cuenot

University of Akron

Stephen S. Fugita

University of Akron

Most social psychological research dealing with homosexuality focuses on heterosexuals' general attitudes, as expressed on questionnaires, toward homosexuals. The present study investigated some specific nonverbal and attitudinal reactions of heterosexuals to a perceived homosexual in an ongoing interaction. Perceived homosexuality, sex of subject, and sex of interviewer were varied in a 2x 2 x 2factorial design. Subjects had similar visual interaction patterns with both the homosexual and the heterosexual but spoke faster to the homosexual. Furthermore, they did not alter their publicly expressed attitudes about homosexuality compared with a previous private expression when interacting with the homosexual. However, they espoused more conservative attitudes about sexual behavior in general. When subjects interacted with a heterosexual, they espoused more liberal general sexual attitudes in the public compared with the private situation. The response to the homosexual was interpreted as a "socially acceptable" defensive reaction to a situation where direct denigration of homosexuality would be disruptive. Further, there was a greater avoidance reaction to same as opposed to opposite sex homosexuals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. R. Hebl and J. F. Dovidio
Promoting the "Social" in the Examination of Social Stigmas
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2005; 9(2): 156 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
C. Kitzinger
Extracts from The Social Construction of Lesbianism
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2004; 14(4): 491 - 501.
[PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. R. Hebl, J. B. Foster, L. M. Mannix, and J. F. Dovidio
Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2002; 28(6): 815 - 825.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
S. PATEL, T. E. LONG, S. L. McCAMMON, and K. L. WUENSCH
Personality and Emotional Correlates of Self-Reported Antigay Behaviors
J Interpers Violence, September 1, 1995; 10(3): 354 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]