Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korabik, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Korabik, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 1, 25-30 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/014616728281004
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Sex-Role Orientation and Impressions

A Comparison of Differing Genders and Sex Roles

Karen Korabik

University of Guelph

The 60 traditionally sex-typed and 60 androgynous subjects-half male and half female within each category-rated the likableness of stimulus persons described by gender and sex-role orientation (traditional, androgynous, or reversed). No preference was found for masculine role descriptions. Reverse sex-role descriptions were rated less positively than traditional or androgynous sex-role descriptions, but this was mediated by the subjects' sex and sex-role orientation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?