Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ashmore, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ashmore, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 2, 348-356 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282082025
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Internships and Practica in Social Psychology Graduate Training Programs

John S. Carroll

Loyola University of Chicago

Carol M. Werner

University of Utah

Richard D. Ashmore

Rutgers University

Many training issues face social psychology programs whose students desire internship and practicum experiences in nonacademic settings. Two programs are described whose faculties have devised very different solutions to such common problems as locating internships and supervising interns. Loyola University of Chicago and the University of Utah may represent opposite ends of a philosophical continuum running from "problem solving for the agency/employer" to "faculty-controlled research in applied settings." Each program's training strategies capitalize on available resources while meeting each faculty's goals for graduate training. The discussion of issues and strategies is directed at assisting others in developing program innovations for training applied social psychologists.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. McKillip
Applied Research Consultants (ARC): The Consulting Firm as a Model for Applied Research Training
American Journal of Evaluation, November 1, 1986; 7(4): 37 - 40.
[PDF]