Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 2, 365-369 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282082028
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Classroom Seating Effects

Environment or Self-Selection Neither, Either, or Both

Douglas W. Levine

University of California, Irvine

Peter J. McDonald

North Georgia College

Edgar C. O'Neal

Tulane University

S. Gray Garwood

Tulane University

Stires's (1982) critique of our study (Levine, McDonald, O'Neal, & Garwood, 1980) and Knowles's (1982) comment on the state of classroom research (both in this issue) are considered. Stires's statement that we interpreted our stud)' as supporting the self-selection rather than the environmental hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate. Instead, we contend that some variables are affected more by location, others by self-selection, and still others by an interaction between the two. Stires's (1980) results are reevaluated and found to be congruent With this View'. We found Knowles's discussion of Griffith's (1921) study and his comments on classroom research provocative, although the relevance to our study seems tangential We fully agree with Knowles about the paucity of theory in this area and suggest several limitations in the existing research that should be dealt with systematically within a theoretical framework.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?