Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pallak, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pallak, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 3, 454-459 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282083011
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Finding Fault Versus Attributing Responsibility

Using Facts Differently

Suzanne R. Pallak

Georgetown University

Jacqueline M. Davies

Georgetown University

To clarify the processes underlying attribution of responsibility and assignment of fault to a victim, female undergraduates read one of four descriptions of a rape perpetrated b, an assailant who had followed the victim home on previous occasions (assault premeditated) or had not (assault not premeditated), against a victim who attempted to take precautions (precautions attempted) or failed to do so (precautions not attempted). More fault was assigned to the victim who failed to take precautions than to the victim who attempted to take precautions. In addition, an interaction was obtained on the responsibility measure such that the maximum responsibility was attributed to the victim who failed to take precautions when the assailant's behavior suggested that his assault was not premeditated. Thus, in judging a rape victim women use information about the victim to assign fault, but they use information about actions of both victim and assailant to attribute responsibility.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Critchlow
The Blame in the Bottle: Attributions about Drunken Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1985; 11(3): 258 - 274.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Critchlow
Blaming the Booze: The Attribution of Responsibility for Drunken Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1983; 9(3): 451 - 473.
[Abstract]