Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McArthur, L. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McArthur, L. Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 3, 460-467 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282083012
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Physical Distinctiveness and Self-Attribution

Leslie Zebrowitz McArthur

Brandeis University

The relationship between physical distinctiveness and causal attribution was assessed by' asking those high and low in self-reported distinctiveness to make causal attributions for hypothetical events. Compared with subjects low in physical distinctiveness, those who were highly distinctive made significantly stronger self-attributions for neutral events and for negative events involving a social interaction, and significantly weaker self-attributions for positive events of a nonsocial nature. Physical distinctiveness had no impact on attributions for nonsocial negative events. These findings, together with other relevant evidence, suggest that physical distinctiveness strengthens self-attributions for social interactions, but not for nonsocial events.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
S. J. Lennon
Categorization as a Function of Body Type
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 1992; 10(2): 18 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
S. J. Lennon and L. L. Davis
Clothing and Human Behavior from a Social Cognitive Framework Part I: Theoretical Perspectives
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, June 1, 1989; 7(4): 41 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Webb, S. Worchel, L. Riechers, and W. Wayne
The Influence of Categorization on Perceptions of Crowding
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1986; 12(4): 539 - 546.
[Abstract]