Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gould, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Slone, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gould, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Slone, C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 3, 477-485 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282083014
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The "Feminine Modesty" Effect

A Self-Presentational Interpretation of Sex Differences in Causal Attribution

Robert J. Gould

Old Dominion University

Caroline G. Slone

Old Dominion University

Causal attributions were made explaining the outcomes of 48 male and 48female subjects who succeeded or failed on an anagram task. Actual outcome was manipulated by varying the difficulty of the anagram task. Half of the subjects were led to believe their scores and ratings would remain private, whereas the other half were told they would participate in a group discussion about scores and causal explanations. Manipulation of anticipated privacy level had little effect under conditions of success, but after failure female subjects made more modest attributions in the public than in the private conditions. Attributions of males remained constant across public and private failure. Results were interpreted as casting doubt on expectancy explanations for sex differences in causal attributions for task outcome and as supporting a self-presentational analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. B. Cialdini, W. Wosinska, A. J. Dabul, R. Whetstone-Dion, and I. Heszen
When Social Role Salience Leads to Social Role Rejection: Modest Self-Presentation among Women and Men in Two Cultures
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1998; 24(5): 473 - 481.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Beyer and E. M. Bowden
Gender Differences in Seff-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1997; 23(2): 157 - 172.
[Abstract]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
W. L. Gardner III, J. Van Eck Peluchette, and S. K. Clinebell
Valuing Women in Management: An Impression Management Perspective of Gender Diversity
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1994; 8(2): 115 - 164.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. S. CRITTENDEN
Asian Self-Effacement or Feminine Modesty?: Attributional Patterns of Women University Students in Taiwan
Gender Society, March 1, 1991; 5(1): 98 - 117.
[Abstract]