Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leippe, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baumgardner, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leippe, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baumgardner, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 4, 644-650 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282084007
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Delayed Persuasion as a Consequence of

Associative Interference: A Context Confusion Effect

Michael R. Leippe

Adelphi University

Anthony G. Greenwald

Ohio State University

Michael H. Baumgardner

Burke Marketing Services, Inc.

Previous research (e.g., Tannenbaum, 1967) indicates that a persuasive message directed at one attitude object may alter opinion toward another, unrelated object. A process of generalization of a learned affective response to objects with some similar qualities might contribute to this indirect effect. Under some conditions, however, associative interference might cause a "spread of persuasion." For instance, when evaluating a particular object, a person who has encountered numerous messages about highly similar and previously unfamiliar attitude objects may occasionally retrieve from memory an evaluative conclusion learned from a message about a different object. To explore this possibility, subjects were exposed to a message-dense setting (48 messages within I hour) in which they received neutral messages about some consumer product brands in a context of either predominantly positive or predominantly negative messages about other, similar brands. Consistent with predictions, subjects' ratings of the neutral brands shifted within minutes toward the evaluation provided by the context. This result is interpreted in terms of an associative learning/interference model of persuasion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. R. Pratkanis, A. G. Greenwald, D. L. Ronis, M. R. Leippe, and M. H. Baumgardner
Consumer-Product and Sociopolitical Messages for Use in Studies of Persuasion
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1986; 12(4): 536 - 538.
[Abstract]