Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfield, D.
Right arrow Articles by Borys, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfield, D.
Right arrow Articles by Borys, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 4, 664-671 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167282084010
© 1982 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Effect of an Encounter with a Black Panhandler on Subsequent Helping for Blacks

Tokenism or Confirming a Negative Stereotype?

David Rosenfield

Southern Methodist University

Jeff Greenberg

University of Arizona

Robert Folger

Southern Methodist University

Robert Borys

Southern Methodist University

Dutton and Lennox p1974) found that subjects who had their egalitarian self images threatened and were then approached by a black panhandler were less responsive to a subsequent opportunity to help blacks than were similarly threatened subjects who had been approached by a white panhandler. Dutton and Lennox reasoned that the donation to the black panhandler served to assuage any guilt the subjects may have felt about being prejudiced and thus allowed them to be less helpful toward blacks when given a subsequent opportunity to help. The present study investigates an alternative explanation of their finding: The black panhandler may have engendered bad feelings toward blacks, thereby causing the subjects to be less helpful to blacks later. Consistent with our explanation, we found that token acts of compliance decreased later helping for black causes only when the token act involved a negative image of blacks (a black panhandler). When the token act involved a positive image of blacks (a black graduate student asking for signatures on a petition supporting more research on sickle-cell anemia), no decrease in subsequent compliance was found.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. A. Saucier, C. T. Miller, and N. Doucet
Differences in Helping Whites and Blacks: A Meta-Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 2 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
B. A. Lee and C. R. Farrell
Buddy, Can You Spare A Dime?: Homelessness, Panhandling, and the Public
Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2003; 38(3): 299 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]