Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kolditz, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arkin, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kolditz, K. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 2, 271-280 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167283092012
© 1983 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Attributions of the Test-Anxious Student

Self-Assessments in the Classroom

Robert M. Arkin

University of Missouri

Thomas A. Kolditz

University of Missouri

Kay Kuhlman Kolditz

University of Missouri

In the present study, an attributional analysis of cognitions associated with the test-anxiety response is reported Late in the semester, 433 undergraduates in introductory level courses (who had scored high, moderate, or low on a test-anxiety inventory) completed a questionnaire that required (l) a self-assessment of success or failure in the course, (2) open-ended attributions about the causes of that success or failure, and (3) that subjects then rate their open-ended responses on several relevant dimensions. A content analysis of students' written accounts suggested that unsuccessful, highly test-anxious students blamed their character (as opposed to their behavior or the environment) for their failure. Consistent with earlier work, there also emerged a general tendency for successful students to emphasize internal over external attributions, while failing students showed an opposite pattern.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
L. Chang, R. M. Arkin, F. T. Leong, D. K. S. Chan, and K. Leung
Subjective Overachievement in American and Chinese College Students
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2004; 35(2): 152 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]