Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Culbertson, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Caporael, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Culbertson, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Caporael, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 2, 305-312 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167283092016
© 1983 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Baby Talk Speech to the Elderly

Complexity and Content of Messages

Glen H. Culbertson

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Linnda R. Caporael

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Previous research has documented the use of speech to institutionalized elderly adults that has the prosodic features (high and variable pitch) of baby talk speech and that communicates positive affect. This study investigated the complexity and verbal content of baby talk speech to the aged. Average sentence length was measured for speech to care receivers in baby talk (B T) and not in baby talk (NBT), and in speech between caregivers (CG). Additionally, judges sorted BT and NBT sentences into message categories. CG was found to be significantly longer than BT and NBT, with equivocal evidence for BT being shorter than NET, which were not reliably different. BT directed at the elderly appears to have co-occurring verbal and nonverbal communicative components, and the verbal content suggests that it may have some functional similarity to speech to children. NBT was hypothesized to be an "institutional"speech type related to the ecology of the nursing home.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
T. R. la Tourette and S. Meeks
Perceptions of Patronizing Speech by Older Women in Nursing Homes and in the Community: Impact of Cognitive Ability and Place of Residence
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2000; 19(4): 463 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
E. B. Ryan, M. L. Hummert, and L. H. Boich
Communication Predicaments of Aging: Patronizing Behavior toward Older Adults
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1995; 14(1-2): 144 - 166.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. M. Coleman, R. Beale, and C. Mills
Identifying Targets of Communication Styles: An Exploratory Study
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1993; 19(2): 213 - 219.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. M. MONTEPARE, J. STEINBERG, and B. ROSENBERG
Characteristics of Vocal Communication Between Young Adults and Their Parents and Grandparents
Communication Research, August 1, 1992; 19(4): 479 - 492.
[Abstract]