|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Assumed Consensus of Attitudes
The Effect of Vested Interest
William D. Crano
Michigan State University
People tend to overestimate the extent of existing support for their attitudes. This study sought to determine whether this assumption of consensus would be influenced by the hedonic relevance of the attitude in question. Accordingly, 144 undergraduates equally divided with respect to class status (freshmen and sophomores versus juniors and seniors) were told that their university administrators were studying a tuition surcharge plan that would affect either underclassmen, upperclassmen, or all students. Respondents were asked to evaluate the plan and to estimate the proportion of other students who shared their attitude. Subjects who thought they would be affected by the plan estimated that considerably more students (of all classes) would share their attitude than did respondents who would not be affected. This vested interest-assumed consensus relationship was independent of attitudinal extremity. Implications of these results for the further study of attitude-behavior consistency and judgmental bias were discussed.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 4,
597-608 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167283094009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wojcieszak and V. Price
What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion
Int. J. Public Opin. Res.,
March 1, 2009;
21(1):
25 - 46.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. van Swol
The Effects of Nonverbal Mirroring on Perceived Persuasiveness, Agreement with an Imitator, and Reciprocity in a Group Discussion
Communication Research,
August 1, 2003;
30(4):
461 - 480.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. TRUMBO, S. DUNWOODY, and R. J. GRIFFIN
Journalists, Cognition, and the Presentation of an Epidemiologic Study
Science Communication,
March 1, 1998;
19(3):
238 - 265.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Krueger and R. W. Clement
Estimates of Social Consensus by Majorities and Minorities: The Case for Social Projection
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
November 1, 1997;
1(4):
299 - 313.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Simon, J. Greenberg, J. Arndt, T. Pyszczynski, R. Clement, and S. Solomon
Perceived Consensus, Uniqueness, and Terror Management: Compensatory Responses to Threats to Inclusion and Distinctiveness Following Mortality Salience
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
October 1, 1997;
23(10):
1055 - 1065.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Fabrigar and J. A. Krosnick
Attitude Importance and the False Consensus Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
May 1, 1995;
21(5):
468 - 479.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Miller
Majority and Minority Perceptions of Consensus and Recommendations for Resolving Conflicts about Land Use Regulation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
August 1, 1993;
19(4):
389 - 398.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|