This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Clary, E. G. Articles by Tesser, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Clary, E. G. Articles by Tesser, A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reactions to Unexpected Events

The Naive Scientist and Interpretive Activity

College of St. Catherine

Abraham Tesser

University of Georgia

The present investigation sought to examine the differential effects of expected versus unexpected information on interpretive activity. It was predicted that expected information would involve an automatic mode of processing, while unexpected information would prompt a more controlled mode. More specifically, we examined the proposition that unexpected or inconsistent information would lead to attempts at generating explanations for the discrepancy, and that the resulting explanations would tend toward maintaining the original expectation. Subjects were exposed to a general description of an actor, and then received additional information consistent or inconsistent with that description; the strength of or confidence in the original expectation was also varied. The primary experimental task involved subjects retelling these stories. The data revealed that, relative to processing consistent information, subjects tended to provide explanations spontaneously for the unexpected events. These findings were discussed in terms of unexpected events producing greater observer involvement, which in turn increases the likelihood of interpretive activity.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Epstude and N. J. Roese The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 168 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. Musher-Eizenman, S. C. Holub, A. B. Miller, S. E. Goldstein, and L. Edwards-Leeper Body Size Stigmatization in Preschool Children: The Role of Control Attributions J. Pediatr. Psychol., December 1, 2004; 29(8): 613 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Ditto, G. D. Munro, A. M. Apanovitch, J. A. Scepansky, and L. K. Lockhart Spontaneous Skepticism: The Interplay of Motivation and Expectation in Responses to Favorable and Unfavorable Medical Diagnoses Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2003; 29(9): 1120 - 1132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Bogart, C. S. Ryan, and M. Stefanov Effects of Stereotypes and Outcome Dependency on the Processing of Information about Group Members Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 1999; 2(1): 31 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Gilbert The Prejudice Perception Assessment Scale: Measuring Stigma Vulnerability among African American Students at Predominantly Euro-American Universities Journal of Black Psychology, August 1, 1998; 24(3): 305 - 321. [Abstract]

				R. Falk Infinity: A Cognitive Challenge Theory Psychology, February 1, 1994; 4(1): 35 - 60. [Abstract]

				S. Kanazawa Outcome or Expectancy? Antecedent of Spontaneous Causal Attribution Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1992; 18(6): 659 - 668. [Abstract]

				G. D. Lassiter, M. A. Briggs, and R. D. Slaw Need for Cognition, Causal Processing, and Memory for Behavior Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1991; 17(6): 694 - 700. [Abstract]