Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magee, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedens, L. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magee, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedens, L. Z.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 12, 1703-1715 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206292094
© 2006 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Emotional Ties That Bind: The Roles of Valence and Consistency of Group Emotion in Inferences of Cohesiveness and Common Fate

Joe C. Magee

New York University

Larissa Z. Tiedens

Stanford University

In three studies, observers based inferences about the cohesiveness and common fate of groups on the emotions expressed by group members. The valence of expressions affected cohesiveness inferences, whereas the consistency of expressions affected inferences of whether members have common fate. These emotion composition effects were stronger than those due to the race or sex composition of the group. Furthermore, the authors show that emotion valence and consistency are differentially involved in judgments about the degree to which the group as a whole was responsible for group performance. Finally, it is demonstrated that valence-cohesiveness effects are mediated by inferences of interpersonal liking and that consistency-common fate effects are mediated by inferences of psychological similarity. These findings have implications for the literature on entitativity and regarding the function of emotions in social contexts.

Key Words: cohesiveness • common fate • emotion • entitativity • groups • inferences

References

  • Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 243-250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Andersen, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 294-307.[CrossRef]
  • Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054-1068.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145-1160.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The mediator-moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1983). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), A dual process model of impression formation: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford.
  • Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y.-Y., & Li, Q. (2003). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism. Oxford, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. N. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7(3), 262-274.[ISI]
  • Brewer, M. B., Weber, J. G., & Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 29-40.
  • Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford.
  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1960). Group dynamics: Research and theory (2nd ed.). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
  • Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735-754.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). A scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-176.[CrossRef]
  • Clark, M. S., Fitness, J., & Brissette, I. (2001). Understanding people' perceptions of relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In G. Gleicher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 253-278). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Clark, M. S., Pataki, S. P., & Carver, V. H. (1996). Some thoughts and findings on self-presentation of emotions in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 247-274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Clark, M. S., & Taraban, C. (1991). Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(4), 324-336.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1076-1094.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 991-1003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384-392.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967-984.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Fineman, S. (1996). Emotion and organizing. In S. R. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 543-564). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of emotions. New York: Norton & Co.
  • Fridlund, A. J., Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1987). Facial expressions of emotion. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (2nd ed., pp. 143-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349-358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336-355.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Maddox, K. B. (1999). Dualities and continua: Implications for understanding perceptions of persons and groups. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 606-626). New York: Guilford.
  • Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121.[Abstract]
  • Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Ip, G. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait-versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368-381.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Jarvis, W. B. G. (2000). MediaLab [Computer software]. Columbus, OH: Empirisoft.
  • Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99-130.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Keltner, D., Young, R. C., Heerey, E. A., Oemig, C., & Monarch, N. D. (1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1231-1247.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Knutson, B. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 165-182.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relationship styles, and the perception of group entitavity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 129-140.
  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223-246.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 194-204.[Abstract]
  • Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Manstead, A. S. (1991). Emotion in social life. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 353-362.
  • McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 750-762.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 701-717.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(4), 297-323.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723-739.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., Robin, L., & Innes-Ker, A. H. (2002). Adult attachment and the perception of facial expression of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 419-433.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • O'Laughlin, M. J., & Malle, B. F. (2002). How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 33-48.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Parkinson, B. (1995). Ideas and realities of emotions. New York: Routledge.
  • Pepitone, A., & Kleiner, R. (1957). The effects of threat and frustration upon group cohesiveness. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 54, 192-199.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Pickett, C. L. (2001). The effects of entitativity beliefs on implicit comparisons between group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 515-525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.[Abstract]
  • Rosenberg, E. L., & Ekman, P. (1994). Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 8(3), 201-229.
  • Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3-30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Sommers, S. (1984). Reported emotions and conventions of emotionality among college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 207-215.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Stroessner, S. J. (1996). Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Social Cognition, 14(3), 247-276.
  • Stroessner, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Mackie, D. M. (1992). Affect and stereotyping: The effect of induced mood on distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 564-576.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Susskind, J., Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 181-191.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Taylor, D. M., Doria, J., & Tyler, J. K. (1983). Group performance and cohesiveness: An attribution analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 119(2), 187-198.
  • Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 86-94.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Stereotypes about sentiments and status: Emotional expectations for highand low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(5), 560-574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tiedens, L. Z., & Leach, C. W. (Eds.). (2004). The social life of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Totterdell, P., Kellett, S., Teuchmann, K., & Briner, R. B. (1998). Evidence of mood linkage in work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1504-1515.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Welbourne, J. L. (1999). The impact of perceived entitativity on inconsistency resolution for groups and individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 481-508.[CrossRef]
  • Wilder, D. A. (1978). Perceiving persons as a group: Effects on attributions of causality and beliefs. Social Psychology, 41(1), 13-23.[CrossRef]
  • Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 141-155.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1089-1103.[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magee, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedens, L. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magee, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedens, L. Z.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?