|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 12,
1716-1728 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206292595
On the Waxing and Waning of Working Memory: Action Orientation Moderates the Impact of Demanding Relationship Primes on Working Memory Capacity
Nils B. Jostmann
Sander L. Koole
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
The present research examined how actionversus state-oriented individuals (Kuhl & Beckmann, 1994) utilize their working memory capacity under varying situational demands. Participants visualized either a demanding or an accepting person, after which their working memory capacity was assessed. Among action-oriented participants, visualizing a demanding person led to greater operation spans (Study 1) and superior memory for intention-related information (Study 2) than visualizing an accepting person. State-oriented participants displayed the opposite pattern, such that visualizing an accepting person led to greater operation spans (Study 1) and superior memory for intentions (Study 2) than visualizing a demanding person. These findings indicate that action versus state orientation moderates the impact of situational demands on working memory capacity.
Key Words: working memory capacity action orientation state ori-entation relationship schemas
References
- Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224-237.
- Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Baldwin, M. W., Carrell, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.[CrossRef]
- Baldwin, M. W., & Sinclair, L. (1996). Self-esteem and "if... then" contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1130-1141.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Affect regulation and motive-incongruent achievement goals: Antecedents of subjective well-being and symptom formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781-799.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Blascovich, J., & Mendes, B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: The role of affective cues. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59-82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 713-737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151-179.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Diefendorff, J. M. (2004). Examination of the roles of action-state orientation and goal orientation in the goal-setting and performance process. Human Performance, 17, 375-395.[CrossRef]
- Diefendorff, J. M., Lord, R. G., Hepburn, E. T., Quickle, J. S., Hall, R. J., & Sanders, R. E. (1998). Perceived self-regulation and individual differences in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 228-247.
- Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 343-353.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control(pp. 102-134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992) Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409-434.
- Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553-573.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious goals associated with relationships partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 148-164.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fuster, J. M. (1995). Memory and planning: Two temporal perspectives of frontal lobe function. In H. H. Jasper, S. Riggio, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Eds.), Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the frontal lobe (pp. 9-18). New York: Raven.
- Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 287-312). New York: Guilford.
- Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.[CrossRef]
- Heckhausen, H., & Strang, H. (1988). Efficiency under record performance demands: Exertion controlan individual difference variable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 489-498.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.[CrossRef]
- Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2006). On the regulation of cognitive control: Action orientation moderates the impact of situational demands in Stroop interference tasks. Manuscript under review, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Jostmann, N. B., Koole, S. L., Van der Wulp, N. Y., & Fockenberg, D. A. (2005). Subliminal affect regulation: The moderating role of action versus state orientation. European Psychologist, 10, 209-217.
- Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
- Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Intention memory and achievement motivation: Volitional facilitation and inhibition as a function of affective contents of need-related stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 426-448.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Klein, K., & Boals, A. (2001). The relationship of life event stress and working memory capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 565-579.[CrossRef]
- Koole, S. L. (2003). [Action versus state orientation among 1,457 Dutch college students]. Unpublished dataset, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Koole, S. L. (2005). [Action versus state orientation, and promotion versus prevention focus]. Unpublished data set, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 974-990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koole, S. L., Kuhl, J., Jostmann, N. B., & Finkenauer, C. (2006). Selfregulation in interpersonal relationships: The case of action versus state orientation. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 360-383). New York: Guilford.
- Koole, S. L., Kuhl, J., Jostmann, N. B., & Vohs, K. D. (2005). On the hidden benefits of state orientation: Can people prosper without efficient affect regulation skills? In A. Tesser, J. Woods, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 217-244). New York: Psychology Press.
- Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
- Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 47-59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
- Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and selfregulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Personality Systems Interactions]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
- Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
- Kuhl, J., & Helle, P. (1986). Motivational and volitional determinants of depression: The degenerated-intention hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Behavior, 95, 247-251.
- Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382-399.[CrossRef]
- Kvavilashvili, L. (1987). Remembering intentions as a distinct form of memory. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 507-518.
- Lorist, M. M., Boksem, M. A. S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 199-205.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do selfattributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Miyake, A., & Shah P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Moskowitz, G. B., Li, P., & Kirk, E. R. (2004). The implicit volition model: On the preconscious regulation of temporarily adopted goals. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 34, pp. 317-414). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Pollack, I. (1970). A nonparametric procedure for evaluation of true and false positives. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 2, 155-156.
- Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Reason, J., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absent-minded? The psychology of mental lapses and everyday errors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33-46.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shah, J. Y. (2003). The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424-439.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Friedman, R. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of selfregulation. In S. J. Spencer & S. Fein (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology(pp. 247-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1994). Choice of decision-making strategies and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 167-176). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
- Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003). Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 454-465.
- Vohs, K. D., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York: Guilford.
- Zwaan, R. A., & Truitt, T. P. (1998). Smoking urges affect language processing. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 325-330.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|