|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Appeal of the Underdog
Joseph A. Vandello
University of South Florida, vandello{at}mail.cas.usf.edu
Nadav P. Goldschmied
University of South Florida
David A. R. Richards
University of South Florida
When people observe competitions, they are often drawn to figures that are seen as disadvantaged or unlikely to prevail. The present research tested the scope and limits of people's support for underdogs. The first two studies demonstrated, in the context of Olympic matches (Study 1) and the Israeli—Palestinian conflict (Study 2), that observers' support for a competitor increased when framing it as an underdog. The final two studies explored mechanisms underlying support for underdogs. Study 3 showed that participants attributed more effort to a team when they believed it to be an underdog, and perceptions of effort mediated liking. In Study 4, participants reading a hypothetical sporting event supported a team with a low probability of success and labeled it an underdog unless it had greater resources than an opponent, suggesting that low expectations by themselves do not engender support if positive outcomes are not seen as deserved.
Key Words: underdog justice social identity competition schadenfreude inequality
References
- American Heritage Dictionary. (2006). The American Heritage dictionary of the English language (4th ed.). Retrieved December 13, 2006, from dictionary.reference.com/browse/underdog
- Associated Press. (2006, March 26). George Mason downs #1 seed UConn. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from www.si.com
- Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator—mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bernhardt, P.C., Dabbs, J.M., Fielden, J.A., & Lutter, C.D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans of sporting events. Physiology and Behavior, 65, 59-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bettencourt, B.A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D.L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Boldry, J.G., & Kashy, D.A. (1999). Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1200-1212.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Brigham, N.L., Kelso, K.A., Jackson, M.A., & Smith, R.H. (1997). The roles of invidious comparison and deservingness in sympathy and schadenfreude. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 363-380.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Campbell, J.D., & Tesser, A. (1986). Self-evaluation maintenance processes in relationships. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 107-135). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Ceci, S.J., & Kain, E.L. (1982). Jumping on the bandwagon with the underdog: The impact of attitude polls on polling behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 228-242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cialdini, R.B., Borden, R.J., Thorne, A., Walker, M.R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L.R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
- Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- End, C.M., Dietz-Uhler, B., Harrick, E.A., & Jacquemotte, L. (2002). Identifying with winners: A reexamination of sport fans' tendency to BIRG. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1017-1030.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (1996). Self-perceptions of fairness in individual and group contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 868-881.[Abstract]
- Feather, N.T. (1991). Attitudes towards the high achiever: Effects of perceiver's own level of competence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 121-124.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Feather, N.T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1-73.[Web of Science]
- Feather, N.T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86-107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Feather, N.T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Press.
- Feather, N.T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953-961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Feather, N.T., Volkmer, R.E., & McKee, I.R. (1991). Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology 43, 85-91.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K.M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Frazier, J.A., & Snyder, E.E. (1991). The underdog concept in sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 380-388.[Web of Science]
- Gibson, B., Sachau, D., Doll, B., & Shumate, R. (2002). Sandbagging in competition: Responding to the pressure of being the favorite. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1119-1130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Goffman, I. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hastorf, A.H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 49, 129-134.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Hirt, E.R., Zillmann, D., Erickson, G.A., & Kennedy, C. (1992). Costs and benefits of allegiance: Changes in fans' self-ascribed competences after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 724-738.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jost, J.T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jost, J.T., & Kay, A.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728-741.[Web of Science]
- Kay, A.C., & Jost, J.T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Leach, C.W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N.R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 932-943.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lerner, M.J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388-399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lerner, M.J., & Miller, D.T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Lowenstein, G.F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M.H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426-441.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Mehrabian, A. (1998). The effects of poll reports on voter preferences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2119-2130.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Mellers, B.A., & McGraw, A.P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Psychological Science, 10, 210-214.
- Mellers, B.A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423-429.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Messick, D.M. (1995). Equality, fairness, and social conflict. Social Justice Research, 8, 153-173.[CrossRef]
- Mueller, C.M., & Dweck, C.S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Neuberg, S.L., Smith, D.M., Hoffman, J.C., & Russell, F.J. (1994). When we observe stigmatized and "normal" individuals interacting: Stigma by association. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 196-209.[Abstract]
- Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Reichl, A.J. (1997). Ingroup favouritism and outgroup favouritism in low status minimal groups: Differential responses to status-related and status-unrelated measures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 617-633.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Ridgeway C.L.( 2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Ridgeway, C.L. (2003). Social status and group structure. In M. A. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 352-375). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
- Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sande, G.N., Ellard, J.H., & Ross, M. (1986). Effect of arbitrarily assigned status labels on self-perceptions and social perceptions: The mere position effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 684-689.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Schimel, J., Pyszcynski, T., Greenberg, J., O'Mahen, H., & Arndt, J. (2000). Running from the shadow: Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 446-462.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shepperd, J.A., & McNulty, J.K. (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychological Science, 13, 85-88.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sherif, M.B., White, J., & Harvey, O.J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370-379.[CrossRef]
- Smith, R.H., Turner, T.J., Garonzik, R., Leach, C.W., Druskat, V.U., & Weston, C.M. (1996). Envy and schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 158-168.[Abstract]
- Snyder, C.R., Lassegard, M., & Ford, C.E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382-388.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
- Stone, J., Perry, Z.W., & Darley, J.M. (1997). "White men can't jump": Evidence for the perceptual confirmation of stereotypes following a basketball game. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(3), 291-306.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
- Wann, D.L., Keenan, B.L., Burnett, S., Martin, J., Page, L., Smith, L., et al. (2002). The impact of sport team identification and attributions of ability and effort on spectators' impressions of athletic performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 347-354.
- Wann, D.L., Roberts, A., & Tindall, J. (1999). The role of team performance, team identification, and self-esteem in sport spectators' game preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 945-950.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yee, D.K., & Eccles, J.S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317-333.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 12,
1603-1616 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167207307488

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|