Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiefer, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiefer, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Men's Sex-Dominance Inhibition: Do Men Automatically Refrain From Sexually Dominant Behavior?

Amy K. Kiefer

University of California, San Francisco, amy.kiefer{at}gmail.com

Diana T. Sanchez

Rutgers University

Men receive conflicting messages about their sexual roles in heterosexual relationships. Men are socialized to initiate and direct sexual activities with women; yet societal norms also proscribe the sexual domination and coercion of women. The authors test these competing hypotheses by assessing whether men inhibit the link between sex and dominance. In Studies 1a and b, using a subliminal priming procedure embedded in a lexical decision task, the authors demonstrate that men automatically suppress the concept of dominance following exposure to subliminal sex primes relative to neutral primes. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors show that men who are less likely to perceive sexual assertiveness as necessary, to refrain from dominant sexual behavior, and who do not invest in masculine gender ideals are more likely to inhibit dominant thoughts following sex primes. Implications for theories of automatic cognitive networks and gender-based sexual roles are discussed.

Key Words: implicit associations • sexual behavior • gender differences • passivity • dominance

References

  • Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P.O., Clinton, A.M., & McAuslan, P. (2001). Alcohol and sexual assault. Alcohol Research and Health, 25, 43-51.
  • Baker, C.N. (2005). Images of women's sexuality in advertisements: A content analysis of Black- and White-oriented women's and men's magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 13-27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bargh, J.A. (1990). Goal != intent: Goal-directed thought and behavior are often unintentional. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 248-251.[CrossRef]
  • Bargh, J.A., & Chartrand, T.L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.[CrossRef]
  • Bargh, J.A., & Chartrand, T.L. (2000). A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bargh, J.A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J.B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power -> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baron, R.A. (1974). The aggression inhibiting force of heightened sexual arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 318-322[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baron, R.A. (1977). Sexual arousal and aggression by males: Effects of type of erotic stimuli and prior provocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 79-87.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baumeister, R.F., Catanese, K.R., & Vohs, K.D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242-273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Baumeister, R.F., Catanese, K.R., & Wallace, H.M. (2002). Conquest by force: A narcissistic reactance theory of rape and sexual coercion. Review of General Psychology, 6, 92-135.
  • Bernat, J.A., Calhoun, K.S., & Adams, H.E. (1999). Sexually aggressive and nonaggressive men: Sexual arousal and judgments in response to acquaintance rape and consensual analogues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 662-673.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Blair, I.V., Ma, J.E., & Lenton, A.P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828-841.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, and sex. New York: Morrow.
  • Carr, T.H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 341-350.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Dank, B.M., & Refinetti, R. (2000). The politics of sexuality. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Ellyson, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-27). New York: Springer.
  • Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiske, S. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Förster, J., & Liberman, N. (2001). The role of attribution of motivation in producing postsuppressional rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 377-390.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E.T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220-239.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Glaser, J. (2003). Reverse priming: Implications for the (un)conditionality of automatic evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 87-108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Glaser, J., & Banaji, M.R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 669-687.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Glaser, J., & Kihlstrom, J.F. (2005). Compensatory automaticity: Unconscious volition is not an oxymoron. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 171-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Grauerholz, E., & Serpe, R.T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1041-1059.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Rudman, L.A., Farnham, S.D., Nosek, B.A., & Mellott, D.S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hebb, D.O. (1948). Research planning in the Canadian Psychological Association: I. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 2, 13-14.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
  • Impett, E.A., & Peplau, L.A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87-100.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jeffreys, S. (1990). Anticlimax: A feminist perspective on the sexual revolution. London: Women's Press.
  • Jhally, S. (1995). Video: Dreamworlds 2: Desire/sex/power in music video. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
  • Keltner, D. (1995). Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 441-454.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kiefer, A.K., & Sanchez, D.T. (2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14, 269-290.[CrossRef]
  • Kiefer, A.K., Sanchez, D.T., Kalinka, C.J., & Ybarra, O. (2006). How women's nonconscious association of sex with submission relates to their arousal and orgasm ability. Sex Roles, 55, 83-94.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kilbourne, J. (2000a). Can't buy my love: How advertising changes the way we think and feel. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Kilbourne, J. (2000b). Video: Killing Us Softly 3: Advertising's image of women. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
  • Lackie, L., & de Man, A.F. (1997). Correlates of sexual aggression among male university students. Sex Roles, 37, 451-457.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275-287.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2000). Expression after suppression: A motivational explanation of postsuppressional rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 190-203.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Macrae, C.N., Bodenhausen, G.V., Milne, A.B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Malamuth, N.M., Sockloskie, R., Koss, M.P., & Tanaka, J.S. (1991). The characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670-681.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McConaghy, N., & Zamir, R. (1995). Sissiness, tomboyism, sex-role, sex identity and orientation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 29, 278-283.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Meyer, D.E., & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
  • Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Shaver, P.R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881-895.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Moskowitz, G.B., Gollwitzer, P.M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mussweiler, T., & Förster, J. (2000). The sex -> aggression link: A perception-behavior dissociation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 507-520.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Neill, W.T., Valdes, L.A., & Terry, K.M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainer (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-226). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • O'Sullivan, L.F., Byers, E.S., & Finkelman, L. (1998). A comparison of male and female college students' experiences of sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 177-195.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Perdue, C.W., Dovidio, J.F., Gurtman, M.B., & Tyler, R.B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475-486.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Perdue, C.W., & Gurtman, M.B. (1990). Evidence for the automaticity of ageism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 199-216.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Pleck, J.H., Sonenstein, F.L., & Ku, L. (1993). Young men's risk behaviors for HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases, 1988 through 1991. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1609-1615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Prentice, D.A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rohlinger, D.A. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61-74.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Sanchez, D.T., Crocker, J., & Boike, K.R. (2005). Doing gender in the bedroom: Investing in gender norms and the sexual experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1445-1455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sanchez, D.T., Kiefer, A., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 512-524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Schwartz, P., & Rutter, V. (2000). The gender of sexuality (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Shah, J.Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261-1280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shearer, C.L., Hosterman, S.J., Gillen, M.M., & Lefkowitz, E.S. (2005). Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and condom-related beliefs? Sex Roles, 52, 311-324.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Shih, M.J., Bonam, C., Sanchez, D.T., & Peck, C. (2007). Beliefs in the social construction of race: Adaptive strategies for multiracials. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 125-133.[Web of Science]
  • Sprecher, S., & McKinney, K. (1993). Sexuality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Stapel, D.A., & Koomen, W. (2000). The impact of opposites: Implications of trait inferences and their antonyms for person judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 439-464.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Steele, C.M., & Southwick, L. (1985). Alcohol and social behavior: The psychology of drunken excess. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 18-34.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tipper, S.P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571-590.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wasel, W., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2002). Willful control of "automatic" stereotype activation: The role of subliminally vs. supraliminally presented stimuli. Social Cognition, 16, 198-210.
  • Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2005). Repeated masked category primes interfere with related exemplars: New evidence for negative semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 108-120.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wood, W., Christensen, P.N., Hebl, M.R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 523-535.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Zurbriggen, E.L. (2000). Social motives and cognitive power-sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 559-581.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 12, 1617-1631 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167207305856
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiefer, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiefer, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?