Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Kwaadsteniet, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by de Rooij, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Kwaadsteniet, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by de Rooij, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Justifying Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Justification Pressures and Tacit Coordination Under Environmental Uncertainty

Erik W. de Kwaadsteniet

Leiden University, KWAADSTENIET{at}fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Eric van Dijk

Leiden University

Arjaan Wit

Leiden University

David De Cremer

Tilburg University

Mark de Rooij

Leiden University

This article investigates how justification pressures influence harvesting decisions in common resource dilemmas. The authors argue that when a division rule prescribes a specific harvest level, such as under environmental certainty, people adhere more strongly to this division rule when they have to justify their decisions to fellow group members. When a division rule does not prescribe a specific harvest level, such as under environmental uncertainty, people restrict their harvests when they have to justify their decisions to fellow group members. The results of two experimental studies corroborate this line of reasoning. The findings are discussed in terms of tacit coordination. The authors specify conditions under which justification pressures may or may not facilitate efficient coordination.

Key Words: social dilemmas • equality • environmental uncertainty • accountability • tacit coordination

References

  • Allison, S.T., McQueen, L.R., & Schaerfl, L.M. (1992). Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 23-42.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Budescu, D.V., Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1990). Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 475-487.[Web of Science]
  • Croson, R., & Marks, M. (1998). Identifiability of individual contributions in a threshold public goods experiment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 167-190.
  • De Cremer, D. (2003). How self-conception may lead to inequality: Effect of hierarchical roles on the equality rule in organizational resource-sharing tasks. Group and Organization Management, 28, 282-302.[CrossRef]
  • De Cremer, D., & Bakker, M. (2003). Accountability and cooperation in social dilemmas: The influence of others' reputational concerns. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 22, 155-163.
  • De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). "The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?" The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93-107.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • De Dreu, C.K.W., Koole, S., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed-pie: A motivated information-processing account of integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 975-987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345-357.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A.P., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations: Social value orientations and tacit coordination under resource size uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 509-516.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Diekmann, K.A. (1997). "Implicit justifications" and self-serving group allocations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 3-16.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63-87.[CrossRef]
  • Fox, J., & Guyer, M. (1978). "Public" choice and cooperation in n-person prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 469-481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gustafsson, M., Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (1999). Over-harvesting of resources of unknown size. Acta Psychologica, 103, 47-64.[CrossRef]
  • Jerdee, T.H., & Rosen, B. (1974). Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behavior in the common interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 712-716.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kerr, N.L. (1995). Norms in social dilemmas. In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 31-47). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Kerr, N.L. (1999). Anonymity and social control in social dilemmas. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects (pp. 103-118). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Komorita, S.S., & Parks, C.D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
  • Lerner, J.S., & Tetlock, P.E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, & H. B. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278-292). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Messick, D.M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 11-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Messick, D.M., Allison, S.T., & Samuelson, C.D. (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members' responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In S. Maital (Ed.), Applied behavioral economics (Vol. 2, pp. 677-700). New York: New York University Press.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rapoport A., Budescu, D.V., Suleiman, R., & Weg, E. (1992). Social dilemmas with uniformly distributed resources. In W. B. G. Liebrand & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 43-57). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
  • Reis, H.T., & Gruzen, J. (1976). On mediating equity, equality, and self-interest: The role of self-presentation in social exchange. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 487-503.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rosenthal, J.A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21, 4, 37-59.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rutte, C.G., Wilke, H.A.M., & Messick, D.M. (1987). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in a resource dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 209-216.
  • Schelling, T.C. (1980). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Scholten, L., Van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (in press). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
  • Sedikides, C., Herbst, K.C., Hardin, D.P., & Dardis, G.J. (2002). Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 592-605.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tenbrunsel, A.E. (1995). Justifying unethical behavior: The role of expectations of others' behavior and uncertainty (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 2768.
  • Tetlock, P.E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Tetlock, P.E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tetlock, P.E., & Boettger, R. (1994). Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 1-23.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Tetlock, P.E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 632-640.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1995). Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 1-16.
  • Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., Wilke, H., & Budescu, D. V. (2004). What we know (and do not know) about the effects of uncertainty on behavior in social dilemmas. In R. Suleiman, D. Budescu, I. Fisher, & D. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 315-331). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, E.U., Blais, A.R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Weber, J.M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D.M. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281-307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wit, A.P., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1998). Public good provision under environmental and social uncertainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 249-256.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 12, 1648-1660 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167207307490
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
D. M. Breaux, T. P. Munyon, W. A. Hochwarter, and G. R. Ferris
Politics as a Moderator of the Accountability--Job Satisfaction Relationship: Evidence Across Three Studies
Journal of Management, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 307 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
E. W. de Kwaadsteniet, E. van Dijk, A. Wit, and D. De Cremer
`How Many of Us Are There?': Group Size Uncertainty and Social Value Orientations in Common Resource Dilemmas
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 387 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Kwaadsteniet, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by de Rooij, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Kwaadsteniet, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by de Rooij, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?