This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) Order Full text via Infotrieve All Versions of this Article: 0146167207311534v1 34/3/407    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Green, J. D. Articles by Davis, J. L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Green, J. D. Articles by Davis, J. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Third-Party Forgiveness: (Not) Forgiving Your Close Other's Betrayer

¹ Virginia Commonwealth University
² University of Richmond

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jdgreen{at}vcu.edu.

	Abstract

Building on attribution and interdependence theories, two experiments tested the hypothesis that close friends of victims (third parties) are less forgiving than the victims themselves (first parties). In Experiment 1, individuals imagined a scenario in which either their romantic partner or the romantic partner of a close friend committed the identical relationship offense. Third parties were less forgiving than first parties, a phenomenon we termed the third-party forgiveness effect. This effect was mediated by attributions about the perpetrator’s intentions and responsibility for the offense. In Experiment 2, first and third parties reported an actual offense and their subsequent unforgiving motivations. The third-party forgiveness effect was replicated and was mediated by commitment to the perpetrator. Perpetrator apology or amends to the victim increased third-party forgiveness. Future third-party research can expand interpersonal forgiveness research beyond the victim-perpetrator dyad.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?