Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0146167207311910v1
34/4/488    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maner, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gailliot, M. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maner, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gailliot, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on January 11, 2008, doi:10.1177/0146167207311910

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008;34:488.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
© 2008 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Article

Selective Attention to Signs of Success: Social Dominance and Early Stage Interpersonal Perception

Jon K. Maner1*, C. Nathan DeWall2, and Matthew T. Gailliot3

1 Florida State University
2 University of Kentucky
3 University of Amsterdam

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: maner{at}psy.fsu.edu.


   Abstract
Results from two experiments suggest that observers selectively attend to male, but not female, targets displaying signs of social dominance. Participants overestimated the frequency of dominant men in rapidly presented stimulus arrays (Study 1) and visually fixated on dominant men in an eyetracking experiment (Study 2). When viewing female targets, participants attended to signs of physical attractiveness rather than social dominance. Findings fit with evolutionary models of mating, which imply that dominance and physical attractiveness sometimes tend to be prioritized preferentially in judgments of men versus women, respectively. Findings suggest that sex differences in human mating are observed not only at the level of overt mating preferences and choices but also at early stages of interpersonal perception. This research demonstrates the utility of examining early-in-the-stream social cognition through the functionalist lens of adaptationist thinking.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?