|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity
Ángel Gómez1*,
John F. Dovidio2,
Carmen Huici1,
Samuel L. Gaertner3,
and
Isabel Cuadrado1
1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
2 Yale University
3 University of Delaware
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: agomez{at}psi.uned.es.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Previous research on the common ingroup identity model has focused on how ones representations of members of the ingroup and outgroup influence intergroup attitudes. Two studies reported here investigated how learning how others, ingroup or outgroup members, conceive of the groups within a superordinate category affects intergroup bias and willingness to engage in intergroup contact. Across both studies, high school students who learned that other ingroup members categorized students at both schools within the common identity of "students" showed less intergroup bias in evaluations and greater willingness for contact. However, consistent with the hypothesized effects of identity threat, when participants read that outgroup members saw the groups within the superordinate category, they exhibited a relatively negative orientation, except when ingroup members also endorsed a superordinate identity (Study 1). This result occurred even when the relative status of the groups was manipulated (Study 2).
First published on October 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/0146167208323600
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008;34:1613.
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Dovidio, S. L. Gaertner, and T. Saguy
Commonality and the Complexity of "We": Social Attitudes and Social Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2009;
13(1):
3 - 20.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|