|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Precarious Manhood and Displays of Physical Aggression
Jennifer K. Bosson1*,
Joseph A. Vandello1,
Rochelle M. Burnaford1,
Jonathan R. Weaver1,
and
S. Arzu Wasti2
1 University of South Florida
2 Sabanci University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jbosson{at}cas.usf.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
The results of three experiments demonstrate that physically aggressive displays are part of mens cultural script for restoring threatened gender status. In Studies 1 and 2, challenges to mens gender status elicited heightened physically aggressive displays, including punching a pad with greater force and selecting an aggressive boxing activity over a nonaggressive puzzle activity. Study 3 established that a public display of aggressive readiness reduced mens anxiety-related cognitions in the wake of a gender threat. This suggests that aggressive displays may function to downregulate negative affect when manhood has been threatened. The discussion considers past research on gender and physical aggression in light of the authors thesis that manhood, relative to womanhood, is culturally defined as a precarious status that must be actively, even aggressively, defended.
First published on February 6, 2009, doi:10.1177/0146167208331161
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009;35:623.
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|