Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spears, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ellemers, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spears, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ellemers, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 5, 538-553 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167297235009
© 1997 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification

Russell Spears

University of Amsterdam sp_spears{at}macmail.psy.uva.nl

Bertjan Doosje

University of Amsterdam

Naomi Ellemers

Free University, Amsterdam

In four studies, effects of self-perceived or public-perceived threats to group status or group distinctiveness on self-stereotyping (defined as similarity to prototypical in-group members) were investigated for people with high or low in-group identification. The main prediction was that high and low identifiers will respond differentially when their group's status or distinctiveness is threatened such that self-stereotyping is reduced for low identifiers but enhanced for high identifiers. Although the four studies investigated different comparison groups and different kinds of group threat, the results of all studies provided support for the prediction, and this was confirmed by a meta-analysis. This supports the authors' argument that the initial level of group identification determines whether group members are likely to set themselves apart from the rest of their group or to show group solidarity when their identity as group members is threatened.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. J. Packer
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 50 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Costarelli
Intergroup Threat and Experienced Affect: The Distinct Roles of Causal Attributions, Ingroup Identification, and Perceived Legitimacy of Intergroup Status
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2007; 33(11): 1481 - 1491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. H. Stone and R. J. Crisp
Superordinate and Subgroup Identification as Predictors of Intergroup Evaluation in Common Ingroup Contexts
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 493 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. K. Sherman, Z. Kinias, B. Major, H. S. Kim, and M. Prenovost
The Group as a Resource: Reducing Biased Attributions for Group Success and Failure via Group Affirmation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 1100 - 1112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. J. Crisp, S. Heuston, M. J. Farr, and R. N. Turner
Seeing Red or Feeling Blue: Differentiated Intergroup Emotions and Ingroup Identification in Soccer Fans
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2007; 10(1): 9 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. Hutchison, J. Jetten, J. Christian, and E. Haycraft
Protecting Threatened Identity: Sticking with the Group by Emphasizing Ingroup Heterogeneity.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1620 - 1632.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. E. Frey and L. R. Tropp
Being Seen As Individuals Versus As Group Members: Extending Research on Metaperception to Intergroup Contexts
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2006; 10(3): 265 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
B. E. J. Doosje, N. R. Branscombe, R. Spears, and A. S. R. Manstead
Antecedents and Consequences of Group-Based Guilt: The Effects of Ingroup Identification
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Crisp, C. H. Stone, and N. R. Hall
Recategorization and Subgroup Identification: Predicting and Preventing Threats From Common Ingroups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2006; 32(2): 230 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. A. Kreindler
A Dual Group Processes Model of Individual Differences in Prejudice
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2005; 9(2): 90 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. J. Crisp and S. R. Beck
Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Moderating Role of Ingroup Identification
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2005; 8(2): 173 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. E. Cameron, J. M. Duck, D. J. Terry, and R. N. Lalonde
Perceptions of Self and Group in the Context of a Threatened National Identity: A Field Study
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2005; 8(1): 73 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
A. Lewis and R. J. Crisp
Measuring Social Identity in the Professional Context of Provision for Pupils with Special Needs
School Psychology International, November 1, 2004; 25(4): 404 - 421.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. J. Hornsey and J. Jetten
The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2004; 8(3): 248 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
K. Van Der Zee, N. Atsma, and F. Brodbeck
The Influence of Social Identity and Personality on Outcomes of Cultural Diversity in Teams
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2004; 35(3): 283 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
E. P. Lemay Jr. and R. D. Ashmore
Reactions to Perceived Categorization by others during the Transition to College: Internalization and Self-Verification Processes
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2004; 7(2): 173 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
L. Blackwood, G. Lafferty, J. Duck, and D. Terry
Putting the Group Back into Unions: A Social Psychological Contribution to Understanding Union Support
Journal of Industrial Relations, December 1, 2003; 45(4): 485 - 504.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
L. R. Tropp
The Psychological Impact of Prejudice: Implications for Intergroup Contact
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2003; 6(2): 131 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Vorauer
Dominant Group Members in Intergroup Interaction: Safety or Vulnerability in Numbers?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2003; 29(4): 498 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. I. Krueger, J. F. Hasman, M. Acevedo, and P. Villano
Perceptions of Trait Typicality in Gender Stereotypes: Examining the Role of Attribution and Categorization Processes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2003; 29(1): 108 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Jetten, N. R. Branscombe, R. Spears, and B. M. McKimmie
Predicting the Paths of Peripherals: The Interaction of Identification and Future Possibilities
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2003; 29(1): 130 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
M. Barreto and N. Ellemers
The Impact of Anonymity and Group Identification on Progroup Behavior in Computer-Mediated Groups
Small Group Research, October 1, 2002; 33(5): 590 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. R. Branscombe, R. Spears, N. Ellemers, and B. Doosje
Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2002; 28(6): 744 - 753.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Barreto and N. Ellemers
The Impact of Respect Versus Neglect of Self-Identities on Identification and Group Loyalty
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2002; 28(5): 629 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Riketta
Intergroup Comparisons within the Context of Nested Self-Categorizations: Effects of Regional and National Comparisons on the Acceptance of the European Union
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2002; 5(2): 119 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Bizman, Y. Yinon, and S. Krotman
Group-Based Emotional Distress: An Extension of Self-Discrepancy Theory
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2001; 27(10): 1291 - 1300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. R. Tropp and S. C. Wright
Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2001; 27(5): 585 - 600.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. J. Terry, C. J. Carey, and V. J. Callan
Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2001; 27(3): 267 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Barreto and N. Ellemers
You Can't Always Do What You Want: Social Identity and Self-Presentational Determinants of the Choice to Work for a Low-Status Group
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2000; 26(8): 891 - 906.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. J. Hornsey and M. A. Hogg
Intergroup Similarity and Subgroup Relations: Some Implications for Assimilation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2000; 26(8): 948 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. N. Lalonde, L. Doan, and L. A. Patterson
Political Correctness Beliefs, Threatened Identities, and Social Attitudes
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2000; 3(3): 317 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
E. S. Kashima, Y. Kashima, and E. A. Hardie
Self-Typicality and Group Identification: Evidence for their Separateness
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2000; 3(1): 97 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
K. B. Henry, H. Arrow, and B. Carini
A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement
Small Group Research, October 1, 1999; 30(5): 558 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. A. Haslam, P. J. Oakes, K. J. Reynolds, and J. C. Turner
Social Identity Salience and the Emergence of Stereotype Consensus
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1999; 25(7): 809 - 818.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
B. Dietz-Uhler
Defensive Reactions to Group-Relevant Information
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 1999; 2(1): 17 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. PETRONIO, N. ELLEMERS, H. GILES, and C. GALLOIS
(Mis)communicating Across Boundaries: Interpersonal and Intergroup Considerations
Communication Research, December 1, 1998; 25(6): 571 - 595.
[Abstract]