• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.
Impact Factor:2.515 | Ranking:Psychology, Social 7 out of 60
Source:2013 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2014)

The Big, the Rich, and the Powerful: Physical, Financial, and Social Dimensions of Dominance in Mating and Attraction

  1. Angela D. Bryan
    1. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA, abryan{at}unm.edu
  1. Gregory D. Webster
    1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  1. Amanda L. Mahaffey
    1. CIS/ISCTE-Lisbon University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Dominance is a key feature on which romantic partners are evaluated, yet there is no clear consensus on its definition. In Study 1 (N = 305), the authors developed scales to measure three putatively distinct dimensions of dominance: social, financial, and physical. In Study 2 (N = 308), the authors used their scales in a mate-selection paradigm and found that women perceived physical dominance to be related to both attractiveness and social dominance. For both sexes, attractiveness predicted desirability for a one-night stand, whereas attractiveness and agreeableness were predictors of desirability for a serious relationship. In Study 3 (N = 124), the authors surveyed romantic partners in monogamous relationships and found that although aspects of a partner’s dominance—financial for women and social for men—played a bivariate role in relationship satisfaction, agreeableness was the strongest predictor of current and future relationship satisfaction and the only significant predictor of relationship dissolution.

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Pers Soc Psychol Bull vol. 37 no. 3 365-382
    All Versions of this Article:
    1. current version image indicatorVersion of Record - Feb 9, 2011
    2. 0146167210395604v1 - Jan 20, 2011
    What's this?
  1. References

Share